Born again (and alienation)
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
Some of our closest friends have remarked upon how our new (to them at least) calling is similar to what we’d be like if we’d have just found Jesus. Namely that we’re quite vocal about it and that we can’t help ourselves from trying to educate others.
This really made us stop and think for a moment. Do we really want to alienate our friends or others that we come into contact with? Ackers & Bealers fully paid up members of the knit your own yoghurt brigade?
After some navel gazing we boiled it down to three questions:
- Are we taking on faith this belief that we should be acting now to massively reduce our carbon footprint and to prepare ourselves and our kids for a world 10-50 years hence that will have hugely reduced energy availability with regular energy shocks and (continuing) resource wars?
- Would we in this sort of world want to still be relying on all our food coming from supermarkets with just-in-time supply chains stretching across the globe?
- Should we be keeping our opinions to ourselves and letting people come to their own conclusions in their own time, possibly when it’s too late?
The answer to 1) & 2) is easy, Nope.
Our personal tipping point came after a couple of years of research into our future lifestyle. We read up voraciously on small holdings, energy decline, climate change, home schooling etc and published most of the home related stuff through Cathie’s old blog. At some point we came to the realisation that whatever we decided to do next with our lives would involve trying very hard to live a low-impact lifestyle. To re-tool and to provide as much food and energy for ourselves as was possible.
The best bit is that it doesn’t matter if we are wrong. If the deniers are right and that the current warming has nothing to do with man-made intervention then what difference does it make that we as a family produce less carbon? If a magic new energy source comes along that can replace oil and gas so that the global economy can continue to be predicated on continual growth then what does it matter if we eat things we’ve grown our bought locally? Will our kids really suffer if they don’t watch telly and instead have a farm to roam around in with their own personal wood to play in?
Question 3) was more difficult as we’re both social people and would hate for people to avoid us because of our views. This blog for instance we’ve not really publicised yet. Partly because the design isn’t finished so we’ve got this default theme but also because we’re conscious of not ramming things down people’s throats so wanted to ease ourselves into it. We don’t want to alienate people but we do feel that it might be useful to others to log our progress.
Watching The Age of Stupid has made us decide to be more militant, though. It brought together everything we’ve learned and reminded us that we have a duty to do what we can to change history.
So, we’re still us: Atheist, open-minded and definitely not wearing sandals with socks. However we do have a fire in our belly and we might talk about things you don’t want to hear. Hopefully you’re cool with that.
Posted in Articles | Comments (2)
Tags: climate change | peak-oil
Mike says:
May 26, 2009 at 9:54 am
Hey both.
You know what I think about your venture: massive quantities of respec’, and also a fair old sprinkling of jealousy, too.
I can only see this subjectively – and from that perspective, I don’t see how what you’re doing can be compared to the “in your faceness” of religious zealotry. The difference to me lies somewhere around the *informed* nature of what you’re doing. The naysayers about climate change are becoming fewer – trending to zero – in the face of massive, distributed, intelligent evidence. And, as you say, the value of Pascal’s Wager (which, ironically, was originally positioned as a reason for believing in God..), is still there even if you’re wrong. There is no downside to what you’re doing. And if it alienates people, well – frankly – tough.
I’d personally rather see *more* passionate conversations about religion, climate change AND politics. I’m pretty full of atheism, too, but I think floppy-armed (thanks, Eddie) – “oo, better keep quiet in case we upset someone” doesn’t do anyone any good at all.
This to me is more about passion, excitement and stepping outside of the norm. I don’t actually see it as “militant” (although I know what you’re getting at).
Frankly, if you start wearing socks and sandals, rock on. :-)
Bealers says:
May 26, 2009 at 4:57 pm
Thanks Mike,
To clarify the militant comment. I wasn’t suggesting that producing this website is militant as it plainly isn’t. I was more meaning that we’re going to do things like attend protests in the future and be a bit more shouty about our opinions.
I think a lot more shouting is needed if Ed Milliband’s interview at the recent transition conference is anything to go by.